US10402626B2 - Recognition of human faces based on population verified reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional human photographs - Google Patents
Recognition of human faces based on population verified reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional human photographs Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US10402626B2 US10402626B2 US15/058,905 US201615058905A US10402626B2 US 10402626 B2 US10402626 B2 US 10402626B2 US 201615058905 A US201615058905 A US 201615058905A US 10402626 B2 US10402626 B2 US 10402626B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- facial
- population
- gender
- linear
- measurements
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000001815 facial effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 71
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 53
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 6
- RLFHKJKDXNVQAY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Trichione Natural products OC(=O)CC(=O)OCCC=CC1=C(O)C(=O)c2cccc(O)c2C1=O RLFHKJKDXNVQAY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000000887 face Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000000744 eyelid Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004872 soft tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 241000395980 Braya glabella Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000083547 Columella Species 0.000 description 1
- NOQGZXFMHARMLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Daminozide Chemical compound CN(C)NC(=O)CCC(O)=O NOQGZXFMHARMLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000295146 Gallionellaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000746998 Tragus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004709 eyebrow Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008921 facial expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001061 forehead Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002207 retinal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004266 retinal recognition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V40/00—Recognition of biometric, human-related or animal-related patterns in image or video data
- G06V40/10—Human or animal bodies, e.g. vehicle occupants or pedestrians; Body parts, e.g. hands
- G06V40/16—Human faces, e.g. facial parts, sketches or expressions
- G06V40/168—Feature extraction; Face representation
- G06V40/171—Local features and components; Facial parts ; Occluding parts, e.g. glasses; Geometrical relationships
-
- G06K9/00281—
-
- G06K9/00288—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V40/00—Recognition of biometric, human-related or animal-related patterns in image or video data
- G06V40/10—Human or animal bodies, e.g. vehicle occupants or pedestrians; Body parts, e.g. hands
- G06V40/16—Human faces, e.g. facial parts, sketches or expressions
- G06V40/172—Classification, e.g. identification
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30196—Human being; Person
- G06T2207/30201—Face
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a human face recognition method, especially to a face recognition method based on population verified reproducibility of measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional (2-D) and 3 dimensional (3-D) human photographs.
- Facial recognition is useful and important in occasions where accurate identification of persons is the only way to protect one's own, organizations' or countries' interest, e. g. at immigration check points, office security, bank account management, counter-terrorism, etc.
- Facial recognition has advantages over other biometric human recognition traits, e. g. finger prints, handprints, voice recognition, retinal recognition, and signatures as it is less invasive, encompasses more details for the recognition process to work on and requires less cooperation of those under investigation.
- facial recognition may have 2 aspects.
- facial authentication is defined as a one-to-one match between the face under investigation against a known facial image of a database.
- facial identification is defined as a one-to-many facial matching between the face under investigation versus multiple faces of a database.
- facial morphologies in face authentication and identification processes typically using facial topological morphing methods.
- Common sources of errors in facial recognition are ambient illumination, facial position, facial expression, aging, hair style, face wears/pierces, etc.
- Big data is needed to enable such a method of facial recognition.
- measuring lines and angles between facial anthropological landmarks and assessing the reproducibility of such measurements in specific ethnic groups will generate big data.
- the present invention provides a human face recognition method based on population verified reproducibility of measurements between facial anthropological landmark on 2 dimensional (2-D) or 3 dimensional (3-D) human photographs.
- the facial recognition method has been developed based on the application of a statistical method, i.e. cumulative standard deviations (SD) or cumulative standard errors (SE) versus sample number (n) plots, to differentiate the degree of reproducibilities of various measurements between facial anthropological landmarks in individuals of ethnic groups.
- Reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks in a particular ethnic group mean they are common features shared by individuals of that particular ethnic group.
- Non-reproducible measurements are unique features of each individual in that ethnic group which may be used for individual facial recognition purposes.
- Such methodology may be computerized for automatic facial recognition.
- a large sample size and hence a large amount of data of each ethnic group are needed for facial recognition.
- the development of databases of each ethnic group will result in a database of human faces including information about which measurements are reproducible within a population or ethnic group, and are thus not necessarily unique to each individual and which measurements are non-reproducible that have been identified by the invention.
- the present invention of measurements between human facial anthropological landmarks has overcome the problems of facial topological morphing, e. g. illumination, positioning, hairstyle, facial wears/piercings and aging.
- facial topological morphing e. g. illumination, positioning, hairstyle, facial wears/piercings and aging.
- Government immigration departments, companies, banks, financial institutions, etc may find advantages of a combination of individual 2-D or 3-D facial landmark measurements for facial recognition. Their practical uses include, but are not limited to, facial recognition of a person at immigration checkpoints, the identification of terrorists, limiting accessibility of individual staff to specific company zones, etc.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an example of facial topological morphing
- FIGS. 3 a and 3 b are schematic views of examples of human facial anthropological landmarks.
- the present invention uses an established and robust statistical method to assess reproducibility of measurements between facial anthropological landmarks.
- the findings may either be reproducible or non-reproducible.
- Reproducible observations of a natural phenomenon carry with it small variations but the core phenomenon remains the same.
- the core phenomenon is record as the mean value (x) after many observations (n) of that phenomenon.
- the small variations are calculated as standard deviation (SD) from the mean value.
- Standard error (SE) may be further calculated from SD.
- Cumulative SE values may also be plotted against n to give a decreasing curve that eventually level off, as shown in FIG. 2 .
- the present invention of facial recognition starts with randomly collecting a number of individuals of the same gender and population for taking 2-D or 3-D photographs in standardized positions. Facial anthropological landmarks are identified as shown in FIG. 3 a and FIG. 3 b with their definitions, on their 2-D or 3-D photographs.
- Linear measurements e.g. a linear measurement from the trichion to the glabella tr-g, or from the trichion to the nasion tr-N
- angular measurements e.g.
- the present invention of facial recognition of 2-D or 3-D photographs of human faces may work together with other facial recognition methods; e.g. retinal examination, to enhance its accuracy level. Also, present invention of facial recognition may be accelerated with computer automatic processes.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
- Measuring And Recording Apparatus For Diagnosis (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
Abstract
A method of facial recognition has been developed by the application of a statistical method, standard deviations or standard errors versus sample number plots, to differentiate the degree of reproducibilities of various measurements between facial anthropological landmarks in individual ethnic groups. Reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks in a particular ethnic group mean they are common features shared by individuals of that ethnic group. Non-reproducible measurements are unique features of each individual in that ethnic group which may be used for individual facial recognition purposes. Such methodology may be computerized for automatic facial recognition. A large amount of data of each ethnic group is needed for facial recognition. In turn, the development of databases of each ethnic group will result in a large amount of data of human faces.
Description
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/105,738 filed Mar. 2, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a human face recognition method, especially to a face recognition method based on population verified reproducibility of measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional (2-D) and 3 dimensional (3-D) human photographs.
Owing to the rapid development of multimedia technology in recent years, human face recognition technologies have been widely used in various application fields. Facial recognition is useful and important in occasions where accurate identification of persons is the only way to protect one's own, organizations' or countries' interest, e. g. at immigration check points, office security, bank account management, counter-terrorism, etc.
Facial recognition has advantages over other biometric human recognition traits, e. g. finger prints, handprints, voice recognition, retinal recognition, and signatures as it is less invasive, encompasses more details for the recognition process to work on and requires less cooperation of those under investigation.
Human minds reflexively recognize familiar faces. Hardware of automatic facial recognition to date is available due to rapid development in the area of microcomputers. The software of facial recognition is largely based on facial topological morphing, as shown in FIG. 1 .
In a biometric system, facial recognition may have 2 aspects. First, facial authentication is defined as a one-to-one match between the face under investigation against a known facial image of a database. Second, facial identification is defined as a one-to-many facial matching between the face under investigation versus multiple faces of a database.
Such matching is largely carried out by comparison of facial morphologies in face authentication and identification processes, typically using facial topological morphing methods. Common sources of errors in facial recognition are ambient illumination, facial position, facial expression, aging, hair style, face wears/pierces, etc.
These errors may be minimised by putting the face under investigation in a standardised positioning under standardised illumination. However, factors like aging, hair style, facial wear and piercings may still be difficult to control. Subtle differences between individuals e. g. between twins, may give rise to further error sources in facial recognition when using topology morphing method.
Moreover, errors related to facial positioning and ambient illumination of the face under investigation may be impossible to control in non-standardised positions, e. g. group photos, in motion video or surveillance camera.
Such errors imply much information load when performing the comparison calculation, consume too much time and resources and compromise accuracy of facial recognition.
This gives rise to a need for alternative method(s) in facial recognition processes without such errors. Linear and angular measurements between anthropological landmarks may overcome such errors. However, there is not yet any idea which lines or angles of the face are to be measured. Which lines or angles of the face are similar within the same ethnic group? Which lines or angles of the face under investigation are unique? The knowledge of such unique measurements between facial anthropological landmarks in the same ethnic group is of utmost importance for such an approach of facial recognition.
Big data is needed to enable such a method of facial recognition. In turn, measuring lines and angles between facial anthropological landmarks and assessing the reproducibility of such measurements in specific ethnic groups will generate big data.
Therefore, in order to overcome the drawbacks exist in the prior art, a method for face recognition and analysis is provided. The particular design in the present invention does not only solve the problems described above, but it is also easy to be implemented. Thus, the present invention has potential applications in the industry.
To solve the aforesaid problems, the present invention provides a human face recognition method based on population verified reproducibility of measurements between facial anthropological landmark on 2 dimensional (2-D) or 3 dimensional (3-D) human photographs.
According to an aspect of the invention, the facial recognition method has been developed based on the application of a statistical method, i.e. cumulative standard deviations (SD) or cumulative standard errors (SE) versus sample number (n) plots, to differentiate the degree of reproducibilities of various measurements between facial anthropological landmarks in individuals of ethnic groups. Reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks in a particular ethnic group mean they are common features shared by individuals of that particular ethnic group. Non-reproducible measurements are unique features of each individual in that ethnic group which may be used for individual facial recognition purposes. Such methodology may be computerized for automatic facial recognition. A large sample size and hence a large amount of data of each ethnic group are needed for facial recognition. In turn, the development of databases of each ethnic group will result in a database of human faces including information about which measurements are reproducible within a population or ethnic group, and are thus not necessarily unique to each individual and which measurements are non-reproducible that have been identified by the invention.
The present invention of measurements between human facial anthropological landmarks has overcome the problems of facial topological morphing, e. g. illumination, positioning, hairstyle, facial wears/piercings and aging. In a conventional sense, government immigration departments, companies, banks, financial institutions, etc, may find advantages of a combination of individual 2-D or 3-D facial landmark measurements for facial recognition. Their practical uses include, but are not limited to, facial recognition of a person at immigration checkpoints, the identification of terrorists, limiting accessibility of individual staff to specific company zones, etc.
Thinking out of the box, if one knows the special features of her/his own face, she/he may set up handpicked passwords made of 2-D or 3-D facial measurements for desirable purposes. An individual may choose a combination of landmark measurements of her-/himself for facial authentication/identification purposes. For example, if an individual knows that the measurement between their left and right exocanthion (ex) and left and right alare (al) are features on their face that is non-reproducible and thus unique within their ethnic group, they can set these measurements as one combination lock to be used in an authentication process. Practical uses include, but are not limited to, passwords for automated teller machines, door/gate locks, passports, credit cards, smartphone lock/encryption, computer and other devices lock/encryption. Advantages over existing methods include environment friendliness and sustainability by reducing plastic card use; no need to remember passwords; no need to wait for card issuing; no need to risk card failure; and avoid loss/theft of cards/body parts (e.g. finger for finger print).
The detailed technology and preferred embodiments implemented for the subject invention are described in the following paragraphs accompanying the appended drawings for people skilled in this field to well appreciate the features of the claimed invention.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and drawings where:
Referring to FIG. 2 , to FIG. 3a and to FIG. 3b of the drawings and in accordance with the principles of the invention, the present invention uses an established and robust statistical method to assess reproducibility of measurements between facial anthropological landmarks.
When studying any natural phenomena, the findings may either be reproducible or non-reproducible. Reproducible observations of a natural phenomenon carry with it small variations but the core phenomenon remains the same. Statistically, the core phenomenon is record as the mean value (x) after many observations (n) of that phenomenon. Statistically, the small variations are calculated as standard deviation (SD) from the mean value. Standard error (SE) may be further calculated from SD.
For every additional observation (n+1) of a specific natural phenomenon, there will be a new mean value (x+1), a new SD (SD+1) and a new SE (SE+1). For a non-reproducible phenomenon, cumulative new SD values will indefinitely increase due to an infinite amount of variations in that phenomenon. SE in a non-reproducible phenomenon, as a function of SD, will indefinitely decrease. For a reproducible phenomenon, cumulative new SD values will level off after an initial increase due to a limited amount of variations in that phenomenon. SE, in a reproducible phenomenon, as function of SD, will level off after an initial decrease, as shown in FIG. 2 .
By plotting cumulative SD values to their corresponding sample numbers (n), a reproducible phenomenon may be identified as a plateau off curve of an initial rising SD vs n curve. Cumulative SE values may also be plotted against n to give a decreasing curve that eventually level off, as shown in FIG. 2 .
The present invention of facial recognition starts with randomly collecting a number of individuals of the same gender and population for taking 2-D or 3-D photographs in standardized positions. Facial anthropological landmarks are identified as shown in FIG. 3a and FIG. 3b with their definitions, on their 2-D or 3-D photographs. Linear measurements (e.g. a linear measurement from the trichion to the glabella tr-g, or from the trichion to the nasion tr-N) or angular measurements (e.g. an angular measurement between the lines from the trichion to the glabella tr-g, or from the trichion to the nasion tr-N) can be made between human facial anthropological landmarks of each human facial 2-D or 3-D photograph. Each linear measurement is measured between at least 2 anthropological landmarks. Each angular measurement is measured between at least 3 anthropological landmarks. Each repeated linear or angular measurement between sampled individuals, starting from the first (n=1) and second (n=2) individual, is calculated for their x, SD and SE. Then, for any additional repeated measurements made on study subjects, i.e. n=1, 2, 3 followed by n=1, 2, 3, 4, etc., new sets of x, SD and SE are calculated. Cumulative SD and/or cumulative SE may be plotted against the number of individuals (n) measured for that particular linear or angular measurement, as shown in FIG. 2 .
If that particular linear or angular measurement is reproducible by the application of cumulative SE vs n plots that show SE values drop with increasing number of individuals studied until a certain level at which a further increase in the number of individuals (n) studied will not show any further decrease in SE on SE vs n curve as shown in FIG. 2 .
If that particular linear or angular measurement is reproducible by the application of cumulative SD vs n plots that show SD values rise with increasing number of individuals studied until a certain level of SD at which any further increase in the number of individuals (n) studied will not show any further increase in SD on the SD vs. n curve as shown in FIG. 2 .
Reproducibility of each linear or angular measurement made from anthropological landmarks of any population may be studied in the same way.
Assessment of landmark measurements' reproducibility may reveal which measurements are reproducible in that particular selected or ethnic population; hence such measurements are being shared by many individuals of that population. On the contrary, non-reproducible measurements may be unique to each individual, and therefore are of good value for individual facial recognition. A combination of 2 or more of such non-reproducible measurements will enhance the accuracy of individual facial recognition. The said non-reproducible measurements can be applied for facial recognition with improved accuracy in ethnic groups and reproducible measurements define facial characteristics of individuals in ethnic groups.
The present invention of facial recognition of 2-D or 3-D photographs of human faces may work together with other facial recognition methods; e.g. retinal examination, to enhance its accuracy level. Also, present invention of facial recognition may be accelerated with computer automatic processes.
Refer to FIG. 3a and FIG. 3b , the definitions of anthropological facial landmarks on 2D or 3D human photographs are listed below.
-
- a. Trichion (tr)—A point on the hairline in the middle of the forehead.
- b. Glabella (g)—The most prominent midline point between the eyebrows.
- c. Nasion (n)—The midpoint on the soft tissue contour of the base of the nasal root.
- d. Subnasale (sn)—The midpoint of the junction of the columella base and the cutaneous surface of the upper lip.
- e. Stomion (sto)—The midpoint of the labial fissure when the lips are closed naturally.
- f. Sublabiale (sl)—The midpoint of the labiomental sulcus.
- g. Pogonion (pg)—The most anterior midpoint of the chin.
- h. Gnathion (gn)—The most anterior and inferior point on the soft tissue chin.
- i. Tragion (t)—The most superior aspect of the tragus where it abuts the face.
- j. Alare (al)—The most lateral point on each alar contour.
- k. Cheilion (ch)—The most lateral aspect of the vermilion border of the corner of the mouth.
- l. Endocanthion (en)—The inner corner of the eye fissure where the eyelids meet.
- m. Exocanthion (ex)—The outer corner of the eye fissure where the eyelids meet.
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail in reference to preferred versions, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
Claims (5)
1. A method of facial recognition of human faces based on reproducibility of linear and/or angular measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional human photographs, comprising the steps of:
selecting a population and randomly collecting male and female individuals from said population, taking 2-D or 3-D photographs of their faces, sorting these 2-D or 3-D photographs by their genders, identifying anthropological facial landmarks on said 2-D or 3-D photographs of a selected gender and making linear and/or angular measurements between anthropological facial landmarks;
wherein said each linear measurement is measured between at least 2 anthropological landmarks;
wherein said each angular measurement is measured between at least 3 anthropological landmarks;
calculating the mean value, standard deviation (SD) and standard error (SE) for said each linear or angular measurement for the selected gender of the selected population (n) starting from a first (n=1) individual having the selected gender and being recalculated for each additional following individual having the selected gender;
plotting cumulative standard deviation (SD) and/or cumulative standard error (SE) for the selected gender of the selected population against the number of individuals (n) of the selected gender of the selected population measured for that particular linear or angular measurement;
identifying, based on the cumulative SE and/or SD vs n plots, which of said linear and/or angular measurements are reproducible and shared within the selected gender of the selected population, and which of said linear and/or angular measurements are non-reproducible and may be unique to an individual; and
utilizing, by a computer processor, two or more of the identified non-reproducible measurements, to identify a particular individual via facial recognition.
2. The method of facial recognition of human faces of claim 1 , wherein a particular linear or angular measurement is reproducible for the selected gender of the selected population by the application of the cumulative SE vs n plots that show SE values drop with increasing number of individuals of the selected gender of the selected population studied until a certain level at which a further increase in the number of individuals (n) of the selected gender of the selected population studied will not show any further decrease in SE.
3. The method of facial recognition of human faces of claim 1 , wherein a particular linear or angular measurement is reproducible for the selected gender of the selected population by the application of the cumulative SD vs n plots that show SD values rise with increasing number of individuals of the selected gender of the selected population studied until a certain level of SD at which any further increase in the number of individuals (n) of the selected gender of the selected population studied will not show any further increase in SD.
4. The method of facial recognition of human faces of claim 1 , wherein said reproducibility of each linear or angular measurement made from anthropological landmarks of any selected population may be studied in the same way.
5. The method of facial recognition of human faces of claim 1 , wherein said reproducible measurements define facial characteristics of individuals in the selected gender of the selected population.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US15/058,905 US10402626B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2016-03-02 | Recognition of human faces based on population verified reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional human photographs |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201562105738P | 2015-03-02 | 2015-03-02 | |
| US15/058,905 US10402626B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2016-03-02 | Recognition of human faces based on population verified reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional human photographs |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20160259966A1 US20160259966A1 (en) | 2016-09-08 |
| US10402626B2 true US10402626B2 (en) | 2019-09-03 |
Family
ID=56850995
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US15/058,905 Active US10402626B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2016-03-02 | Recognition of human faces based on population verified reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional human photographs |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US10402626B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2018148896A1 (en) * | 2017-02-16 | 2018-08-23 | 深圳市锐明技术股份有限公司 | Method and device for counting number of passengers in vehicle |
| USD896254S1 (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2020-09-15 | Perfect Mobile Corp. | Display screen with graphical user interface |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050084140A1 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2005-04-21 | University Of Houston | Multi-modal face recognition |
| US20090180673A1 (en) * | 2008-01-16 | 2009-07-16 | Degutis Joseph Michael | Method and apparatus for enhancing face recognition abilities in a user |
| US20090185723A1 (en) * | 2008-01-21 | 2009-07-23 | Andrew Frederick Kurtz | Enabling persistent recognition of individuals in images |
| US20130223694A1 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2013-08-29 | Karl Ricanek, JR. | Demographic Analysis of Facial Landmarks |
| US20150178554A1 (en) * | 2013-12-19 | 2015-06-25 | Objectvideo, Inc. | System and method for identifying faces in unconstrained media |
-
2016
- 2016-03-02 US US15/058,905 patent/US10402626B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050084140A1 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2005-04-21 | University Of Houston | Multi-modal face recognition |
| US20090180673A1 (en) * | 2008-01-16 | 2009-07-16 | Degutis Joseph Michael | Method and apparatus for enhancing face recognition abilities in a user |
| US20090185723A1 (en) * | 2008-01-21 | 2009-07-23 | Andrew Frederick Kurtz | Enabling persistent recognition of individuals in images |
| US20130223694A1 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2013-08-29 | Karl Ricanek, JR. | Demographic Analysis of Facial Landmarks |
| US20150178554A1 (en) * | 2013-12-19 | 2015-06-25 | Objectvideo, Inc. | System and method for identifying faces in unconstrained media |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
| Title |
|---|
| Anicÿ-Milo{hacek over (s)}evicÿ, Sandra, Marina Lapter-Varga, and Mladen {hacek over (S)}laj. "Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements." The European Journal of Orthodontics 30.2 (2008): 135-140. 6 pages. * |
| Gupta, Shalini, Mia K. Markey, and Alan C. Bovik. "Anthropometric 3D face recognition." International journal of computer vision 90.3 (2010): 331-349. 19 pages. * |
| Kirk, David. "The Virtual Irrelevancy of Population Size to Required Sample Size." Twentythirdfloor.co.za. N.p., Apr. 5, 2013. Web. Mar. 28, 2018. 9 pages. * |
| Oladipo, G. S., M. A. Eroje, and H. B. Fahwehinmi. "Anthropometric comparison of nasal indices between Andoni and Okrika tribes of Rivers State, Nigeria." International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 1.4 (2009): 135-137. 3 pages. * |
| Simon, Steve. "StATS: Relationship between the Standard Deviation and the Sample Size (May 26, 2006)." pmean.com. N.p., May 26, 2006. Web. Mar. 28, 2018. 14 pages. * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20160259966A1 (en) | 2016-09-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10509985B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for security inspection | |
| Paone et al. | Double trouble: Differentiating identical twins by face recognition | |
| Lee et al. | Correlation between average tissue depth data and quantitative accuracy of forensic craniofacial reconstructions measured by geometric surface comparison method | |
| Riccio et al. | EGA—Ethnicity, gender and age, a pre-annotated face database | |
| Silverstein et al. | Implementation of facial recognition with Microsoft Kinect v2 sensor for patient verification | |
| Guo et al. | Cross-age face recognition on a very large database: The performance versus age intervals and improvement using soft biometric traits | |
| US10402626B2 (en) | Recognition of human faces based on population verified reproducible measurements between facial anthropological landmarks on 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional human photographs | |
| Qinjun et al. | Facial recognition technology: a comprehensive overview | |
| Mardia et al. | On statistical problems with face identification from photographs | |
| CN107392191B (en) | Method for judging identity, device and electronic equipment | |
| CN112541474A (en) | Video surface examination assisting method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| Hackett et al. | Face similarity linkage: A novel biometric approach to sexually motivated serial killer victims | |
| Kabbara et al. | Hidden biometrie identification/authentication based on phalanx selection from hand X-ray images with safety considerations | |
| Hameed et al. | Novel simulation framework of three-dimensional skull bio-metric measurement | |
| Evison et al. | The Magna Database: A database of three-dimensional facial images for research in human identification and recognition | |
| Mohammed et al. | Human biometric identification: Application and evaluation | |
| Chen et al. | Observer success rates for identification of 3D surface reconstructed facial images and implications for patient privacy and security | |
| Upadhyay et al. | Personality Analysis using Edge Detection | |
| Irum et al. | How to Build an Automated Fingerprint Identification System | |
| Ulupinar et al. | The importance of standardization in biometric data for digital forensics | |
| Saha et al. | Anthropometric measurement of north-east Indian faces for forensic face analysis | |
| RU2779445C1 (en) | Method and system for automated identification threshold determination for biometric samples in the access control system | |
| CN113688784B (en) | Face recognition-based medical insurance card embezzlement risk recognition method and related equipment thereof | |
| Bhandiwad et al. | A Review Paper on 2D to 3D Face Recognition Technology | |
| Malhotra et al. | Biometric face recognition and issues |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: M AND M TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, HONG KONG Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TANG, TIN HONG ALEXANDER;ZWAHLEN, ROGER ARTHUR;JAYARATNE, YASAS SRI NALAKA;REEL/FRAME:049823/0541 Effective date: 20190617 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |